The sections below are divided into several categories that particularize by US racialized group in order to acknowledge their different histories, and by other categories that offer the equally inportant examples of the best current work which is comparative and being done at the intersections of race with gender, class, nationality, sexuality and empire.Īll citations in this bibliography are arranged chrono-topically, not alphabetically, to give a sense of theoretical developments emerging over time. Thus these works should be read as at once substantive contributions to their fields, and as critiques of the inadequate theorization of race and other constructions of cultural difference in traditional AmSt work (as well as in humanities and social science scholarship generally). Racial and ethnic theory have had a profound impact on all levels and kinds of humanities and social science scholarship. Thus each subsection is structured to move towards points of intersection with the other categories. In addition, while separating racial studies from gender studies from sexuality studies serves to highlight their respective evolutions and achievements, it does so at the cost of obscuring multiple identities and complex interactions. Hence I have also placed works reexamining these topics in other sections, cross-referencing some of them here. Separating race from gender from sexuality from other modalities of difference threatens to re-marginalize them just as they are claiming their centrality to any cultural analysis. This category in particular points up the inadequacies of categorization, especially in interdisciplinary work. And the new scholarly attention paid to previously marginalized subjects of history deeply reshaped theories and methods of study. This process was fueled by the rise of ethnic and women's studies within and outside AS. Those movements also set in motion a profound rethinking and rewriting of ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality and other modalities of "difference" that further challenged monolithic conceptions of Americanness. The breakdown of notions of American exceptionalism and class consensus analyzed in Section IV, was driven in large part by social movements of the 1960s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |